Prediction of Petra Martic [114th] vs Liel Marlies Rothensteiner [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L L L
Form
W L W L W W L W W LH2H: Martic 1 - 0 Rothensteiner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martic winning 2 and Rothensteiner winning 0. The last match between Martic and Rothensteiner was at the Upper Austria Ladies Linz - Linz, 26-01-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Petra Martic getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petra Martic | 1 |
| Liel Marlies Rothensteiner | 0 |
| Martic | Stats | Rothensteiner |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (9-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (6-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 114 | Ranking | N/A |
| 14 | Highest Rank | |
| 34 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (443-340) | Career Total W/L | 45% (40-48) |
| $5,871,490 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Martic VS Rothensteiner H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Petra Martic
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Martic VS Rothensteiner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:1:11 | Average Match Time | 1:1:11 |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 49% (22/45) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (25/45) | Return Points Win % | 30% (14/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Petra Martic vs Liel Marlies Rothensteiner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martic 1 - 0 Rothensteiner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martic has won 40.9% of points on their second serve, while Rothensteiner has won 37.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martic, in recent form, has won 50.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rothensteiner has won 45.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.49% and 30.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martic has saved 49.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rothensteiner has saved 41.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martic has won 47.92% of matches played (W/L 23/ 25), with Rothensteiner winning 48.65% (W/L 18/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 177/ 106), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 175/ 161). Rothensteiner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Martic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/ 10), where as Rothensteiner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martic winning 1 times and Rothensteiner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martic winning 2 and Rothensteiner winning 0. The last match between Martic and Rothensteiner was at the Upper Austria Ladies Linz - Linz, 26-01-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Petra Martic getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martic and Rothensteiner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martic winning 0 times and Rothensteiner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Martic winning 0, and Rothensteiner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martic has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.77 while Rothensteiner has played against players with an average rank of 31.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martic has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rothensteiner has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martic has converted 35.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rothensteiner has converted 35.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Petra Martic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Petra Martic
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Petra Martic
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Petra Martic
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Petra Martic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Petra Martic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Sloane Stephens
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Hanna Chang
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Lia Karatancheva
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Petra Martic
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
9
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Elina Avanesyan
62%
(
82 of
132)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
60 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Milana Zhabrailova
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
Player
Luise Reisel
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
Player
Georgina Hays
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamila Gadamauri
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Poling
Player
Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Martic vs Rothensteiner?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Martic Vs Rothensteiner is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (443/340) | Win/Loss | 45% (40/48) |
| 54% (997/833) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (91/105) |
| 52% (8946/8323) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (856/907) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 2381 | Aces Total | 46 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2292 | Total Double Faults | 164 |
| 1:12:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 118.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 86.36 |
| 61% (27277/44941) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1378/2355) |
| 66% (18120/27277) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (806/1378) |
| 47% (8335/17664) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (376/977) |
| 44% (2231/5018) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (113/237) |
| 42% (19346/45687) | Return Points Win % | 42% (952/2277) |
| 57% (439/771) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (38/86) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (109/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 59% (159/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 88% (399/350) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (43/35) |
| 12% (399/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (43/8) |
| 24% (384/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (45/3) |
See recent tennis photos of Martic and Rothensteiner
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Liel Marlies Rothensteiner
View full predicted draw for Rothensteiner
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
